Pod Security Policies
Kubernetes v1.17
beta- The version names contain beta (e.g. v2beta3).
- Code is well tested. Enabling the feature is considered safe. Enabled by default.
- Support for the overall feature will not be dropped, though details may change.
- The schema and/or semantics of objects may change in incompatible ways in a subsequent beta or stable release. When this happens, we will provide instructions for migrating to the next version. This may require deleting, editing, and re-creating API objects. The editing process may require some thought. This may require downtime for applications that rely on the feature.
- Recommended for only non-business-critical uses because of potential for incompatible changes in subsequent releases. If you have multiple clusters that can be upgraded independently, you may be able to relax this restriction.
- Please do try our beta features and give feedback on them! After they exit beta, it may not be practical for us to make more changes.
Pod Security Policies enable fine-grained authorization of pod creation and updates.
- What is a Pod Security Policy?
- Enabling Pod Security Policies
- Authorizing Policies
- Policy Order
- Example
- Policy Reference
- What's next
What is a Pod Security Policy?
A Pod Security Policy is a cluster-level resource that controls security sensitive aspects of the pod specification. The PodSecurityPolicy objects define a set of conditions that a pod must run with in order to be accepted into the system, as well as defaults for the related fields. They allow an administrator to control the following:
Control Aspect | Field Names |
---|---|
Running of privileged containers | privileged |
Usage of host namespaces | hostPID , hostIPC |
Usage of host networking and ports | hostNetwork , hostPorts |
Usage of volume types | volumes |
Usage of the host filesystem | allowedHostPaths |
White list of FlexVolume drivers | allowedFlexVolumes |
Allocating an FSGroup that owns the pod’s volumes | fsGroup |
Requiring the use of a read only root file system | readOnlyRootFilesystem |
The user and group IDs of the container | runAsUser , runAsGroup , supplementalGroups |
Restricting escalation to root privileges | allowPrivilegeEscalation , defaultAllowPrivilegeEscalation |
Linux capabilities | defaultAddCapabilities , requiredDropCapabilities , allowedCapabilities |
The SELinux context of the container | seLinux |
The Allowed Proc Mount types for the container | allowedProcMountTypes |
The AppArmor profile used by containers | annotations |
The seccomp profile used by containers | annotations |
The sysctl profile used by containers | forbiddenSysctls ,allowedUnsafeSysctls |
Enabling Pod Security Policies
Pod security policy control is implemented as an optional (but recommended) admission controller. PodSecurityPolicies are enforced by enabling the admission controller, but doing so without authorizing any policies will prevent any pods from being created in the cluster.
Since the pod security policy API (policy/v1beta1/podsecuritypolicy
) is
enabled independently of the admission controller, for existing clusters it is
recommended that policies are added and authorized before enabling the admission
controller.
Authorizing Policies
When a PodSecurityPolicy resource is created, it does nothing. In order to use
it, the requesting user or target pod’s service
account must be
authorized to use the policy, by allowing the use
verb on the policy.
Most Kubernetes pods are not created directly by users. Instead, they are typically created indirectly as part of a Deployment, ReplicaSet, or other templated controller via the controller manager. Granting the controller access to the policy would grant access for all pods created by that controller, so the preferred method for authorizing policies is to grant access to the pod’s service account (see example).
Via RBAC
RBAC is a standard Kubernetes authorization mode, and can easily be used to authorize use of policies.
First, a Role
or ClusterRole
needs to grant access to use
the desired
policies. The rules to grant access look like this:
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: <role name>
rules:
- apiGroups: ['policy']
resources: ['podsecuritypolicies']
verbs: ['use']
resourceNames:
- <list of policies to authorize>
Then the (Cluster)Role
is bound to the authorized user(s):
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: <binding name>
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: <role name>
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
subjects:
# Authorize specific service accounts:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: <authorized service account name>
namespace: <authorized pod namespace>
# Authorize specific users (not recommended):
- kind: User
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
name: <authorized user name>
If a RoleBinding
(not a ClusterRoleBinding
) is used, it will only grant
usage for pods being run in the same namespace as the binding. This can be
paired with system groups to grant access to all pods run in the namespace:
# Authorize all service accounts in a namespace:
- kind: Group
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
name: system:serviceaccounts
# Or equivalently, all authenticated users in a namespace:
- kind: Group
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
name: system:authenticated
For more examples of RBAC bindings, see Role Binding Examples. For a complete example of authorizing a PodSecurityPolicy, see below.
Troubleshooting
- The Controller Manager must be run against the secured API port, and must not have superuser permissions. Otherwise requests would bypass authentication and authorization modules, all PodSecurityPolicy objects would be allowed, and users would be able to create privileged containers. For more details on configuring Controller Manager authorization, see Controller Roles.
Policy Order
In addition to restricting pod creation and update, pod security policies can also be used to provide default values for many of the fields that it controls. When multiple policies are available, the pod security policy controller selects policies according to the following criteria:
- PodSecurityPolicies which allow the pod as-is, without changing defaults or mutating the pod, are preferred. The order of these non-mutating PodSecurityPolicies doesn’t matter.
- If the pod must be defaulted or mutated, the first PodSecurityPolicy (ordered by name) to allow the pod is selected.
Note: During update operations (during which mutations to pod specs are disallowed) only non-mutating PodSecurityPolicies are used to validate the pod.
Example
This example assumes you have a running cluster with the PodSecurityPolicy admission controller enabled and you have cluster admin privileges.
Set up
Set up a namespace and a service account to act as for this example. We’ll use this service account to mock a non-admin user.
kubectl create namespace psp-example
kubectl create serviceaccount -n psp-example fake-user
kubectl create rolebinding -n psp-example fake-editor --clusterrole=edit --serviceaccount=psp-example:fake-user
To make it clear which user we’re acting as and save some typing, create 2 aliases:
alias kubectl-admin='kubectl -n psp-example'
alias kubectl-user='kubectl --as=system:serviceaccount:psp-example:fake-user -n psp-example'
Create a policy and a pod
Define the example PodSecurityPolicy object in a file. This is a policy that simply prevents the creation of privileged pods. The name of a PodSecurityPolicy object must be a valid DNS subdomain name.
policy/example-psp.yaml
|
---|
|
And create it with kubectl:
kubectl-admin create -f example-psp.yaml
Now, as the unprivileged user, try to create a simple pod:
kubectl-user create -f- <<EOF
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: pause
spec:
containers:
- name: pause
image: k8s.gcr.io/pause
EOF
Error from server (Forbidden): error when creating "STDIN": pods "pause" is forbidden: unable to validate against any pod security policy: []
What happened? Although the PodSecurityPolicy was created, neither the
pod’s service account nor fake-user
have permission to use the new policy:
kubectl-user auth can-i use podsecuritypolicy/example
no
Create the rolebinding to grant fake-user
the use
verb on the example
policy:
Note: This is not the recommended way! See the next section for the preferred approach.
kubectl-admin create role psp:unprivileged \
--verb=use \
--resource=podsecuritypolicy \
--resource-name=example
role "psp:unprivileged" created
kubectl-admin create rolebinding fake-user:psp:unprivileged \
--role=psp:unprivileged \
--serviceaccount=psp-example:fake-user
rolebinding "fake-user:psp:unprivileged" created
kubectl-user auth can-i use podsecuritypolicy/example
yes
Now retry creating the pod:
kubectl-user create -f- <<EOF
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: pause
spec:
containers:
- name: pause
image: k8s.gcr.io/pause
EOF
pod "pause" created
It works as expected! But any attempts to create a privileged pod should still be denied:
kubectl-user create -f- <<EOF
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: privileged
spec:
containers:
- name: pause
image: k8s.gcr.io/pause
securityContext:
privileged: true
EOF
Error from server (Forbidden): error when creating "STDIN": pods "privileged" is forbidden: unable to validate against any pod security policy: [spec.containers[0].securityContext.privileged: Invalid value: true: Privileged containers are not allowed]
Delete the pod before moving on:
kubectl-user delete pod pause
Run another pod
Let’s try that again, slightly differently:
kubectl-user run pause --image=k8s.gcr.io/pause
deployment "pause" created
kubectl-user get pods
No resources found.
kubectl-user get events | head -n 2
LASTSEEN FIRSTSEEN COUNT NAME KIND SUBOBJECT TYPE REASON SOURCE MESSAGE
1m 2m 15 pause-7774d79b5 ReplicaSet Warning FailedCreate replicaset-controller Error creating: pods "pause-7774d79b5-" is forbidden: no providers available to validate pod request
What happened? We already bound the psp:unprivileged
role for our fake-user
,
why are we getting the error Error creating: pods "pause-7774d79b5-" is
forbidden: no providers available to validate pod request
? The answer lies in
the source - replicaset-controller
. Fake-user successfully created the
deployment (which successfully created a replicaset), but when the replicaset
went to create the pod it was not authorized to use the example
podsecuritypolicy.
In order to fix this, bind the psp:unprivileged
role to the pod’s service
account instead. In this case (since we didn’t specify it) the service account
is default
:
kubectl-admin create rolebinding default:psp:unprivileged \
--role=psp:unprivileged \
--serviceaccount=psp-example:default
rolebinding "default:psp:unprivileged" created
Now if you give it a minute to retry, the replicaset-controller should eventually succeed in creating the pod:
kubectl-user get pods --watch
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
pause-7774d79b5-qrgcb 0/1 Pending 0 1s
pause-7774d79b5-qrgcb 0/1 Pending 0 1s
pause-7774d79b5-qrgcb 0/1 ContainerCreating 0 1s
pause-7774d79b5-qrgcb 1/1 Running 0 2s
Clean up
Delete the namespace to clean up most of the example resources:
kubectl-admin delete ns psp-example
namespace "psp-example" deleted
Note that PodSecurityPolicy
resources are not namespaced, and must be cleaned
up separately:
kubectl-admin delete psp example
podsecuritypolicy "example" deleted
Example Policies
This is the least restrictive policy you can create, equivalent to not using the pod security policy admission controller:
policy/privileged-psp.yaml
|
---|
|
This is an example of a restrictive policy that requires users to run as an unprivileged user, blocks possible escalations to root, and requires use of several security mechanisms.
policy/restricted-psp.yaml
|
---|
|
Policy Reference
Privileged
Privileged - determines if any container in a pod can enable privileged mode. By default a container is not allowed to access any devices on the host, but a “privileged” container is given access to all devices on the host. This allows the container nearly all the same access as processes running on the host. This is useful for containers that want to use linux capabilities like manipulating the network stack and accessing devices.
Host namespaces
HostPID - Controls whether the pod containers can share the host process ID namespace. Note that when paired with ptrace this can be used to escalate privileges outside of the container (ptrace is forbidden by default).
HostIPC - Controls whether the pod containers can share the host IPC namespace.
HostNetwork - Controls whether the pod may use the node network namespace. Doing so gives the pod access to the loopback device, services listening on localhost, and could be used to snoop on network activity of other pods on the same node.
HostPorts - Provides a whitelist of ranges of allowable ports in the host
network namespace. Defined as a list of HostPortRange
, with min
(inclusive)
and max
(inclusive). Defaults to no allowed host ports.
Volumes and file systems
Volumes - Provides a whitelist of allowed volume types. The allowable values
correspond to the volume sources that are defined when creating a volume. For
the complete list of volume types, see Types of
Volumes. Additionally, *
may be used to allow all volume types.
The recommended minimum set of allowed volumes for new PSPs are:
- configMap
- downwardAPI
- emptyDir
- persistentVolumeClaim
- secret
- projected
Warning: PodSecurityPolicy does not limit the types ofPersistentVolume
objects that may be referenced by aPersistentVolumeClaim
, and hostPath typePersistentVolumes
do not support read-only access mode. Only trusted users should be granted permission to createPersistentVolume
objects.
FSGroup - Controls the supplemental group applied to some volumes.
- MustRunAs - Requires at least one
range
to be specified. Uses the minimum value of the first range as the default. Validates against all ranges. - MayRunAs - Requires at least one
range
to be specified. AllowsFSGroups
to be left unset without providing a default. Validates against all ranges ifFSGroups
is set. - RunAsAny - No default provided. Allows any
fsGroup
ID to be specified.
AllowedHostPaths - This specifies a whitelist of host paths that are allowed
to be used by hostPath volumes. An empty list means there is no restriction on
host paths used. This is defined as a list of objects with a single pathPrefix
field, which allows hostPath volumes to mount a path that begins with an
allowed prefix, and a readOnly
field indicating it must be mounted read-only.
For example:
allowedHostPaths:
# This allows "/foo", "/foo/", "/foo/bar" etc., but
# disallows "/fool", "/etc/foo" etc.
# "/foo/../" is never valid.
- pathPrefix: "/foo"
readOnly: true # only allow read-only mounts
Warning:There are many ways a container with unrestricted access to the host filesystem can escalate privileges, including reading data from other containers, and abusing the credentials of system services, such as Kubelet.
Writeable hostPath directory volumes allow containers to write to the filesystem in ways that let them traverse the host filesystem outside the
pathPrefix
.readOnly: true
, available in Kubernetes 1.11+, must be used on allallowedHostPaths
to effectively limit access to the specifiedpathPrefix
.
ReadOnlyRootFilesystem - Requires that containers must run with a read-only root filesystem (i.e. no writable layer).
FlexVolume drivers
This specifies a whitelist of FlexVolume drivers that are allowed to be used
by flexvolume. An empty list or nil means there is no restriction on the drivers.
Please make sure volumes
field contains the
flexVolume
volume type; no FlexVolume driver is allowed otherwise.
For example:
apiVersion: policy/v1beta1
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
metadata:
name: allow-flex-volumes
spec:
# ... other spec fields
volumes:
- flexVolume
allowedFlexVolumes:
- driver: example/lvm
- driver: example/cifs
Users and groups
RunAsUser - Controls which user ID the containers are run with.
- MustRunAs - Requires at least one
range
to be specified. Uses the minimum value of the first range as the default. Validates against all ranges. - MustRunAsNonRoot - Requires that the pod be submitted with a non-zero
runAsUser
or have theUSER
directive defined (using a numeric UID) in the image. Pods which have specified neitherrunAsNonRoot
norrunAsUser
settings will be mutated to setrunAsNonRoot=true
, thus requiring a defined non-zero numericUSER
directive in the container. No default provided. SettingallowPrivilegeEscalation=false
is strongly recommended with this strategy. - RunAsAny - No default provided. Allows any
runAsUser
to be specified.
RunAsGroup - Controls which primary group ID the containers are run with.
- MustRunAs - Requires at least one
range
to be specified. Uses the minimum value of the first range as the default. Validates against all ranges. - MayRunAs - Does not require that RunAsGroup be specified. However, when RunAsGroup is specified, they have to fall in the defined range.
- RunAsAny - No default provided. Allows any
runAsGroup
to be specified.
SupplementalGroups - Controls which group IDs containers add.
- MustRunAs - Requires at least one
range
to be specified. Uses the minimum value of the first range as the default. Validates against all ranges. - MayRunAs - Requires at least one
range
to be specified. AllowssupplementalGroups
to be left unset without providing a default. Validates against all ranges ifsupplementalGroups
is set. - RunAsAny - No default provided. Allows any
supplementalGroups
to be specified.
Privilege Escalation
These options control the allowPrivilegeEscalation
container option. This bool
directly controls whether the
no_new_privs
flag gets set on the container process. This flag will prevent setuid
binaries
from changing the effective user ID, and prevent files from enabling extra
capabilities (e.g. it will prevent the use of the ping
tool). This behavior is
required to effectively enforce MustRunAsNonRoot
.
AllowPrivilegeEscalation - Gates whether or not a user is allowed to set the
security context of a container to allowPrivilegeEscalation=true
. This
defaults to allowed so as to not break setuid binaries. Setting it to false
ensures that no child process of a container can gain more privileges than its parent.
DefaultAllowPrivilegeEscalation - Sets the default for the
allowPrivilegeEscalation
option. The default behavior without this is to allow
privilege escalation so as to not break setuid binaries. If that behavior is not
desired, this field can be used to default to disallow, while still permitting
pods to request allowPrivilegeEscalation
explicitly.
Capabilities
Linux capabilities provide a finer grained breakdown of the privileges traditionally associated with the superuser. Some of these capabilities can be used to escalate privileges or for container breakout, and may be restricted by the PodSecurityPolicy. For more details on Linux capabilities, see capabilities(7).
The following fields take a list of capabilities, specified as the capability
name in ALL_CAPS without the CAP_
prefix.
AllowedCapabilities - Provides a whitelist of capabilities that may be added
to a container. The default set of capabilities are implicitly allowed. The
empty set means that no additional capabilities may be added beyond the default
set. *
can be used to allow all capabilities.
RequiredDropCapabilities - The capabilities which must be dropped from
containers. These capabilities are removed from the default set, and must not be
added. Capabilities listed in RequiredDropCapabilities
must not be included in
AllowedCapabilities
or DefaultAddCapabilities
.
DefaultAddCapabilities - The capabilities which are added to containers by default, in addition to the runtime defaults. See the Docker documentation for the default list of capabilities when using the Docker runtime.
SELinux
- MustRunAs - Requires
seLinuxOptions
to be configured. UsesseLinuxOptions
as the default. Validates againstseLinuxOptions
. - RunAsAny - No default provided. Allows any
seLinuxOptions
to be specified.
AllowedProcMountTypes
allowedProcMountTypes
is a whitelist of allowed ProcMountTypes.
Empty or nil indicates that only the DefaultProcMountType
may be used.
DefaultProcMount
uses the container runtime defaults for readonly and masked
paths for /proc. Most container runtimes mask certain paths in /proc to avoid
accidental security exposure of special devices or information. This is denoted
as the string Default
.
The only other ProcMountType is UnmaskedProcMount
, which bypasses the
default masking behavior of the container runtime and ensures the newly
created /proc the container stays intact with no modifications. This is
denoted as the string Unmasked
.
AppArmor
Controlled via annotations on the PodSecurityPolicy. Refer to the AppArmor documentation.
Seccomp
The use of seccomp profiles in pods can be controlled via annotations on the PodSecurityPolicy. Seccomp is an alpha feature in Kubernetes.
seccomp.security.alpha.kubernetes.io/defaultProfileName - Annotation that specifies the default seccomp profile to apply to containers. Possible values are:
unconfined
- Seccomp is not applied to the container processes (this is the default in Kubernetes), if no alternative is provided.runtime/default
- The default container runtime profile is used.docker/default
- The Docker default seccomp profile is used. Deprecated as of Kubernetes 1.11. Useruntime/default
instead.localhost/<path>
- Specify a profile as a file on the node located at<seccomp_root>/<path>
, where<seccomp_root>
is defined via the--seccomp-profile-root
flag on the Kubelet.
seccomp.security.alpha.kubernetes.io/allowedProfileNames - Annotation that
specifies which values are allowed for the pod seccomp annotations. Specified as
a comma-delimited list of allowed values. Possible values are those listed
above, plus *
to allow all profiles. Absence of this annotation means that the
default cannot be changed.
Sysctl
By default, all safe sysctls are allowed.
forbiddenSysctls
- excludes specific sysctls. You can forbid a combination of safe and unsafe sysctls in the list. To forbid setting any sysctls, use*
on its own.allowedUnsafeSysctls
- allows specific sysctls that had been disallowed by the default list, so long as these are not listed inforbiddenSysctls
.
Refer to the Sysctl documentation.
What's next
Refer to Pod Security Policy Reference for the api details.
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Thanks for the feedback. If you have a specific, answerable question about how to use Kubernetes, ask it on Stack Overflow. Open an issue in the GitHub repo if you want to report a problem or suggest an improvement.